Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Two new (four now)




7 comments:

Timo Lehtinen said...

With regard to the issue of content, the disjunctive perturbation of the spatial relationships endangers the devious simplicity of the eloquence of these pieces.

It should be added that the disjunctive perturbation of the spatial relationships brings within the realm of discourse the distinctive formal juxtapositions.

Timo Lehtinen said...

Sorry about that. I am just testing out the The Instant Art Critique Phrase Generator.

Chris S. said...

I think the first one is an interesting composition but would be better if the brick wall foreground was also in focus. Hence, a greater aperture would do that and prevent the out of focus distracting from the "disjunctive perturbation of the spatial relationships"...

Bronislaus Janulis / Framewright said...

Well, it's quite obvious the spatial relationships are completely out of sync with the bokeh of the bouquet.

Timo Lehtinen said...

I like the two new ones more. In fact ...

I find this work menacing/playful because of the way the reductive quality of the gesture spatially undermines the exploration of montage elements.

Anonymous said...

It's composition my friend. All the stuff you have out of focus in these pictures detracts from what you want in a serious way. Lets try composing in a way that there are no off mater bokens detracting from what you want to center your picture on. For instance, loose the car or bench or whatever on the first. Use a better lens on the second, why is the fence such a out of focus blur? The birch could be wonderful if more of it was in focus. Love your stuff...generally...

Anonymous said...

I ment to add the last shot is a gem.